Association study of interleukin-10 and P53 polymorphisms and their influence on Iranian women with recurrent abortion
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Clinical Investigation
VOLUME: 22 ISSUE: 1
P: 46 - 54
March 2025

Association study of interleukin-10 and P53 polymorphisms and their influence on Iranian women with recurrent abortion

Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2025;22(1):46-54
1. Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch, Department of Genetics, Tehran, Iran
2. Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Fertility, Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ahvaz, Iran
3. Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch, Department of Biology, Tehran, Iran
4. Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Diabetes Research Center, Health Research Institute, Ahvaz, Iran
5. Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Genetics, Ahvaz, Iran
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 15.10.2024
Accepted Date: 14.12.2024
Online Date: 10.03.2025
Publish Date: 10.03.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objective

Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA), characterized by multiple miscarriages without a known cause, includes both genetic and non-genetic factors. In this research, we studied the association between two polymorphisms of the interleukin (IL)-10 and P53 genes and RSA for the first time in the southwest of Iran. 

Materials and Methods

This was a case-control study involving 62 patients with a history of at least two RSA of unknown etiology, as well as 66 healthy individuals. Clinical factors were analyzed. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood. Genotyping was performed using amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain technique to investigate two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of P53 and IL-10 genes. Gene-gene interactions were analyzed by logistic regression. Statistical analysis was performed using a significance level of p<0.05.

Results

Allelic and genotypic frequencies as well as dominant, recessive and over dominant models for two SNPs, rs1042522 and rs1800871, were investigated. No significant association with RSA (p>0.05) was found. The combination of the homozygote CC for the polymorphism rs1042522 in the P53 gene and the homozygote CC for the polymorphism rs1800871 in the homozygote CC for the polymorphism rs1800871 in the IL-10 gene was associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion (p=0.01). Meanwhile, the phenotypic frequency of individuals with a history of consanguineous marriage was statistically significant between the case and control groups (p=0.003). 

Conclusion

Limited studies have been conducted on the association between these two polymorphisms and RSA, and conflicting results have been obtained. Further investigation with a larger sample size may confirm results. Genetic research, such as this, helps understand genetic factors associated with the risk of RSA.

Keywords:
Polymorphism, infertility, abortion, spontaneous

PRECIS: In this research, the association of interleukin-10 and P53 genes polymorphisms with recurrent spontaneous abortion was studied.

Introduction

Miscarriage, clinically termed spontaneous abortion, represents one of the prevailing complications in pregnancy, defined as the natural termination and expulsion of a fetus before it can independently sustain life. The term “miscarriage” commonly encompasses all forms of pregnancy loss occurring prior to the 20th week of gestation(1). Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) occurs when spontaneous abortion occurs more than twice during the initial 20 weeks of pregnancy, posing a significant challenge as it affects up to 20% of known pregnancies(2). There are approximately one to two percent of women of childbearing suffering from RSA, which describes women who suffer from three or more continuous miscarriages in a row(2). Predominantly observed between 8 and 12 weeks of gestation, with reduced prevalence in instances where etiology diverges, RSA substantially impacts pregnancy outcomes, warranting exploration into its underlying genetic determinants(3). Furthermore, the prevalence of RSA approximates one in every 300 births, underscoring its clinical significance(3). Notably, in individuals with a history of RSA, the likelihood of subsequent miscarriage increases progressively, with probabilities of 24%, 30%, and 40-50% after two, three, and four miscarriages, respectively(3). RSA, from a medical standpoint, may also precipitate infertility owing to successive pregnancy losses(3).

The identifiable causes of RSA primarily include chromosomal abnormalities, anatomical irregularities, and hormonal imbalances (such as progesterone, estrogen, diabetes, thyroid disorders)(4). However, over half of RSA cases (>50%) are attributed to deficiencies in blood coagulation proteins(5). This deficiency in the blood clotting system is often associated with defects in coagulation inhibitors or proteins involved in the fibrinolytic pathway, resulting in an increased risk of blood clot formation(5). Limited literature reports instances where deficiencies in clotting factors serve as the underlying cause of RSA. The most common deficiencies implicated include factor XIII, factor XII, and fibrinogen, which includes afibrinogenemia and dysfibrinogenemia(6).

RSA is a multifactorial disease, and different genes affect the occurrence of this disease. Genetic involvement in pregnancy complications is substantiated by candidate gene-based association studies, wherein specific polymorphic variants of genes are scrutinized for their potential roles in pregnancy(7). In this way, several polymorphisms are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as RSA(8, 9).

Interleukin (IL)-10 orchestrates intricate interactions with various factors and cell types pivotal to pregnancy(10). A successful gestation relies on maintaining equilibrium between immune responses mediated by Th1 and Th2 cells(11). Notably, fetal survival correlates with a prevailing Th2 immune response, while a Th1-dominant response is linked to pregnancy failure(12). IL-10, acting as a crucial regulator of Th2 immune responses, exerts potent anti-inflammatory effects by suppressing proinflammatory cytokine synthesis, thereby fostering a Th2 cytokine milieu that downregulates Th1 cytokine expression(13). Enhanced maternal IL-10 production is associated with successful pregnancies, whereas diminished levels are implicated in recurrent fetal loss, potentially predisposing to immune system compromise and placental vascular insufficiency during pregnancy(13)

The regulation of IL-10 production is genetically determined and controlled at the transcriptional level, likely involving regulatory sequences within its promoter region(14). Several studies suggested that certain IL-10 polymorphisms may heighten the risk of spontaneous abortion or confer protective effects against it(15). Notably, several single nucleotide polymorphisms within the IL-10 gene promoter region, such as -1082(A/G) (rs1800896), -819 (C/T) (rs1800871), and -592 (C/A) (rs1800872), have been implicated in increased rates of spontaneous abortions among some populations(16). However, the precise role of IL-10 gene polymorphisms in RSA remains a subject of debate. 

On the other hand, the P53 gene, known for its pleiotropic effects, plays a crucial role in vasculogenesis and cell apoptosis, essential processes for successful trophoblast cell invasion(17). Recent investigations have revealed elevated apoptosis levels in chorionic villi and decidua, alongside heightened P53 gene expression in placental villi among patients with recurrent unexplained spontaneous abortions(18). These findings suggest that P53 gene-induced apoptosis may contribute to RSA, underscoring its potential role as a pregnancy mediator with estrogen and progesterone activities. Various reports have linked several polymorphisms of the P53 gene with RSA.

In a multivariate analysis, the P53 p.Pro72Arg (rs1042522) polymorphism was investigated, revealing an association with RSA and increased risk. The P53 gene induces the expression of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF); it is appropriate to consider the association of P53 gene polymorphisms in patients who experience RSA and infertility, compared to fertile control groups(19). A proline-rich domain at codon 72 is associated with reduced LIF expression, lower apoptosis rates, and G1 cell cycle arrest compared with arginine at codon 72(20). These findings suggest that this polymorphism in the P53 gene may serve as a risk factor for spontaneous abortion. In this study, for the first time, we aimed to investigate the potential association between genetic polymorphisms in the IL-10 gene (rs1800871) and the P53 gene (rs1042522) with RSA of unknown etiology in the population of Southwestern Iran.

Materials and Methods

This case-control study targeted 62 women with a primary diagnosis of RSA as the patient group and 66 women with no history of abortion as the control group. Firstly, informed consent forms were obtained from all patients and healthy individuals participating in the study. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch (approval no: IR.IAU.TNB.REC.1401.065, date: 13.12.2022). Blood samples were collected from infertility treatment clinics for women in Ahvaz city, referred by gynecologists. The samples were then transferred to the Genetics Department Laboratory of Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, following strict adherence to cold chain protocols.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Patients with RSA and A Healthy Control Group

In this study, women experiencing RSA, characterized by a history of at least two spontaneous abortions before the 20th week of pregnancy, were selected as the patient cohort. Medical records and examination results of all enrolled subjects were thoroughly reviewed for evaluation of chromosomal, anatomical, and pathological abnormalities, as well as common coagulation factors (c.C667T, c.A1298C), MTHFR, FACTOR II (c. G20210A), FACTOR V (c.G1691A), PAI 1 (4G/5G). This was done to ensure normalcy. Additionally, structured questionnaires were administered to gather pertinent information, including age, ethnicity, parity, history of abortion or infertility in the family, and consanguinity. Exclusion criteria encompassed the presence of chromosomal abnormalities in children and parents, anatomical uterine and ovarian disorders, antiphospholipid syndrome, and mutations in coagulation factors. A cohort of women free from a history of miscarriage, infertility, hormonal and anatomical abnormalities, and possessing at least two healthy children was chosen as the control group. Similar to the approach used for the patient cohort, a comprehensive questionnaire was administered to gather demographic and clinical data. 

Blood DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from anticoagulated peripheral blood samples using a DNA blood extraction kit (Sina Clon Company, Iran), and stored at -20 °C. All DNA extraction procedures were meticulously carried out in a Biosafety Level 2 laboratory. Genotyping of rs1800871 (c.-C819T) in IL-10 and rs1042522 (p.Arg72Pro) in P53 was performed using the amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Designed primers were used for PCR amplification, with details provided in Table 1(21, 22). PCR reactions were conducted in a thermal cycler, and the resulting amplicons were analyzed via 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Subsequently, cycles of denaturation, annealing, and extension were carried out. The reaction mixture for both polymorphisms underwent an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 4 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 seconds, annealing and extension at 72 °C for 30 seconds for both single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Concerning the rs1800871 polymorphism, the annealing step was set at 60 °C for 30 seconds, and for the rs1042522 polymorphism, the annealing step was set at 64 °C for 30 seconds. Both protocols concluded with a final extension step: 72 °C for 2 minutes for both SNPs. Then, 10% of the samples were evaluated to genotype both polymorphisms by the Sanger sequencing method.

Statistical Analysis

In this research, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 26.0 (Chicago, Illinois, USA), and the χ2 test were used for data analyses. Continuous variables were expressed in the form of mean ± standard deviation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to check whether the data were normally distributed. Normally distributed and abnormally distributed data between two groups were calculated by t-test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively.

In order to verify any genotyping error, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was calculated using the chi-squared test. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) women with miscarriage compared to fertile women were calculated among four frequent genetic inheritance models, including the allelic model, dominant, recessive, and overdominant model. The p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. At the end of the work to verify the specificity of the primers used and the accuracy of genotyping, Sanger sequencing was performed using the PCR primer and Big Dye Terminators (model 3130 Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems Foster City CA USA). Then, Sanger sequence analysis was conducted by Chromas 2.6.6 software.

Results

Demographic Characteristics of the Studied Subjects

Sampling for this study was conducted exclusively among case and control groups in Southwest Iran. The patient cohort with RSA, for whom the cause remained undiagnosed despite specialist consultation and genetic/pathological investigations, requires further study. The average age of the patient group was 30.69±4.76 years, with an average history of 3.18 miscarriages. On the other hand, the average age of the healthy control group was 32.73±5.31 years. Key demographic information, including average age, smoking habits, consanguinity, and history of abortions and infertility, is summarized in Table 2. A statistically significant disparity in the rate of consanguineous marriages among parents was observed between the patient and control groups (p=0.003), highlighting a potential contributing factor to RSA. Furthermore, no significant difference was noted in the average age between patients and healthy controls (p=0.1), and smoking habits were comparable across both groups (p=0.6). The t-test was employed for quantitative variables such as age, whereas the χ2 test, was utilized to assess smoking habits as smoking habits are qualitative. 

Association Study of rs1800871 and rs1042522 Polymorphisms with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion

Statistical analysis of genotypic and allelic distributions for both rs1800871 and rs1042522 SNPs, is presented in Table 3. No significant associations were observed in genotypic frequencies between control subjects and patients in these two polymorphisms. Herein, we presented different models, including allelic, dominant, recessive, and over dominant models in Tables 4 and 5. Besides, we compared heterozygote with normal homozygote genotypes in the case and control groups for both SNPs. No significant differences between case and control groups, when using different models for both studied polymorphisms in P53 and IL-10 genes (Tables 4 and 5). Furthermore, OR calculations for the CT and TT genotypes using rs1800871 polymorphism, as well as the CG and GG genotypes for rs1042522 polymorphism did not demonstrate significant associations with RSA (p>0.05) (Tables 4 and 5). The HWE equilibrium analysis confirmed the balance of the rs1800871 and rs1042522 SNPs within the study population. 

Combined Genotype Distribution for rs1800871 and rs1042522 Polymorphism 

The combined genotype distribution of rs1800871 and rs1042522 SNPs was analyzed in both RSA cases and control groups. Among the comparisons that have been made, the CC + CC genotype combination was significantly more frequent in patients with RSA compared to the control group in this study (16.1% vs. 3.0%, OR: 0.163, 95% CI: 0.034-0.755, p=0.011). However, other genotype combinations, including GG + CC, CC + CT, CC + TT, CG + CC, CG + CT, CG + TT, GG + CT, and GG + TT, did not demonstrate significant differences between the two groups (Table 6). Overall, these findings suggest a potential association between specific genotype combinations of rs1800871 and rs1042522 SNPs and susceptibility to recurrent abortion, providing insights into the genetic factors underlying this condition.

Discussion

To date, the simultaneous association of the SNPs rs1042522 and rs1800871 with RSA has not been investigated on a global scale. In this research, we studied the association of two polymorphisms in P53 and IL-10 genes with RSA, in the southwest of Iran for the first time. One of our main findings indicated that the genotypes frequency of P53 rs1042522 and IL-10 rs1800871 SNPs didn’t show significant differences between RSA and control groups (p>0.05). Meanwhile, the comparison of alleles, recessive, dominant, and over dominant models did not demonstrate significant association between patients and healthy controls. 

Previous research has analyzed the genotype and alleles of these polymorphisms individually, yielding results that either align with or contradict our findings. These findings demonstrated a complex association between P53 and IL-10 gene polymorphisms and RSA, which may vary across different populations. Concerning the rs1042522 polymorphism, similar results lacking an association between this polymorphism and RSA have been reported in previous studies. For instance, Yoon et al.(23) in 2015 in Korea studied 594 individuals (294 patients and 300 healthy individuals) and revealed no significant association (p=0.3) between the rs1042522 polymorphism and RSA. On the other hand, Allafan et al.(25) in 2015 in Iran, Mashhad city (in the northeast of Iran), investigated 120 individuals (80 patients and 40 healthy individuals) and reported no association between the rs1042522 polymorphism and repeated in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure (p>0.05). In 2011, Wiwanitkit(26) studied a population in India a population including 302 patients, 302 patients, 57 controls, and 70 IVF failure cases. They reported no significant association between rs1042522 polymorphism and RSA or recurrent implantation failure (p>0.05).

Conversely, contrasting results have been reported in some studies for the rs1042522 polymorphism. For instance, in one of the cities in the center of Iran, Firouzabadi et al.(27) conducted a study in 2009, involving 62 individuals (41 patients and 21 healthy individuals), which revealed that the rs1042522 polymorphism may be a contributing factor in recurrent miscarriage and implantation failure (p=0.038). In 2013, a study in Spain by Lldeo et al.(28) demonstrated a significant association (p<0.05) between the rs1042522 polymorphism and RSA in a population, which included 98 patients and 83 healthy individuals. Similarly, a study in Spain in 2018 by Turienzo et al.(29) reported a significant association between the rs1042522 polymorphism and RSA in a non-selective population comprising 89 patients and 89 healthy individuals (p<0.05). Another study on RSA, conducted in Greece in 2022 by Dedousi et al.(30), involving 206 individuals (100 patients and 106 controls), confirmed a significant association between the studied polymorphism and RSA (p=0.002).

Concerning association studies of the rs1800871 polymorphism in IL-10 with RSA, various studies have demonstrated contradictory results. For instance, similarly to our results, in 2013, in India, Parveen et al.(31) found no significant association between RSA and rs1800871 polymorphism in a population of 298 individuals (134 patients and 164 healthy individuals) (p=0.3). Similarly, in 2014 in Bahrain, Qaddourah et al.(32) demonstrated no significant association between RSA and the rs1800871 polymorphism [-819(C/T)] in an Arab population comprising 296 patients and 305 healthy individuals (p=0.3). 

Conversely, some studies have confirmed the association of the rs1800871 polymorphism with RSA. In Iran, in 2014, Bahadori et al.(33) investigated the association between rs1800871 polymorphism and RSA in a population of 196 individuals, comprising 191 patients and 95 healthy controls, in Tehran, and the results of their research were reported to be significant (p=0.006). In another study in 2014 in Ukraine, Zastavna et al.(34) demonstrated a significant association between rs1800871 polymorphism and RSA in a population of 100 patients and 73 healthy individuals (p<0.001). Similarly, in Romania in the same year, Bohiltea and Radoi(35) found a significant association between the rs1800871 polymorphism and RSA in a population of 69 patients and 64 healthy individuals (p=0.02). In 2015, Liu et al.(36) showed a significant association between the rs1800871 polymorphism and RSA in a Chinese Asian population comprising 284 patients and 284 healthy individuals. Additionally, in 2017, in the Indian Asian population, Vidyadhari et al.(23) showed a significant association between the rs1800871 polymorphism and RSA in a population of 180 individuals (100 healthy and 80 patients) (p<0.001).

Regarding all contradictory results in different studies, the non-significance observed in our study’s findings may be attributed to ethnic differences and possibly the need for a larger sample size to investigate these polymorphisms further. Despite the high allelic frequency of these two studied polymorphisms, studying more samples across various countries and ethnicities is necessary to obtain a more accurate understanding of its association with RSA. Such studies are crucial for identifying factors involved for women with a history of RSA in different populations. 

The second main result of this study was that individuals with the CC homozygous genotype for rs1042522 and rs1800871 polymorphisms were at an increased risk of spontaneous abortion (p=0.01) (Table 6). This is the first study that demonstrates the combined genotype distribution of these two polymorphisms, with RSA, which might provide novel insights into their combined influence on RSA. However, further studies need to be performed to confirm this effect.

The last main findings in our study were from investigating several phenotypic characteristics such as consanguineous marriage and the age of women in the target and control groups. According to the results obtained from this study, consanguineous marriage is likely to be associated with RSA (p=0.003), although so far most studies have been mainly cross-sectional and selected in specific regions and ethnic groups. The highest rate of consanguineous marriage can be observed in Middle Eastern countries. the prevalence of consanguineous marriage in Iran is about 38.6%, Due to socio-cultural factors. There is controversy as to whether there is any correlation between RSA and consanguinity(36). Rad(38) determined that RSA occurs more frequently among related couples than those unrelated in India. An Iranian study conducted in 2010 found RSA to be more prevalent in the consanguineous group as compared to the non-consanguineous group. However, Saad and Jauniaux(39) found in 2002 that consanguinity did not correlate with RSA in Qatar. They concluded that this finding could be explained by the fact that autosomal recessive alleles are uncommon in Qatar. It could also be explained by the lack of association between consanguinity and RSA. In 2011, Gowri et al.(40) reported that consanguinity appears not to have any significant impact on the etiology of RSA and has no association with it in Oman. Further studies will be necessary to draw a conclusion.

Conclusion

As a result, research on rs1042522 and rs1800871 SNP and RSA is limited in Iran. Previous studies have linked IL-10 gene rs1800871 and P53 gene rs1042522 polymorphisms with RSA with different results. Research in this area is necessary to enhance understanding of the genetic factors of RSA and to identify possible risk factors for it.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch (approval no: IR.IAU.TNB.REC.1401.065, date: 13.12.2022).
Informed Consent: Informed consent was obtained from the patients.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the patients and the healthy individuals for their cooperation in our study. The authors would like to thank Farima Samani, M.Sc., for her assistance with the data analysis in this study.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: P.G., Design: P.G., Data Collection or Processing: N.R.B., K.S., F.S., Analysis or Interpretation: K.S., F.S., P.G., Literature Search: N.R.Z., P.K., Writing: N.R.Z.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Robinson GE. Pregnancy loss. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:169-78.
2
Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY; Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). Executive summary of European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31:15-7.
3
Messerlian C, Williams PL, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Carignan CC, Ford JB, Butt CM, et al. Organophosphate flame-retardant metabolite concentrations and pregnancy loss among women conceiving with assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:1137-44.e1.
4
Kaur R, Gupta K. Endocrine dysfunction and recurrent spontaneous abortion: an overview. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016;6:79-83.
5
Lippi G, Franchini M, Montagnana M, Favaloro EJ. Inherited disorders of blood coagulation. Ann Med. 2012;44:405-18.
6
Inbal A, Muszbek L. Coagulation factor deficiencies and pregnancy loss. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29:171-4.
7
Daher S, Mattar R, Gueuvoghlanian-Silva BY, Torloni MR. Genetic polymorphisms and recurrent spontaneous abortions: an overview of current knowledge. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67:341-7.
8
Hyde KJ, Schust DJ. Genetic considerations in recurrent pregnancy loss. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5:a023119.
9
Toufektchan E, Toledo F. The guardian of the genome revisited: p53 downregulates genes required for telomere maintenance, DNA repair, and centromere structure. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10:135.
10
Cheng SB, Sharma S. Interleukin-10: a pleiotropic regulator in pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2015;73:487-500.
11
Ghaebi M, Nouri M, Ghasemzadeh A, Farzadi L, Jadidi-Niaragh F, Ahmadi M, et al. Immune regulatory network in successful pregnancy and reproductive failures. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;88:61-73.
12
Raghupathy R. Pregnancy: success and failure within the Th1/Th2/Th3 paradigm. Semin Immunol. 2001;13:219-27.
13
Sabat R, Grütz G, Warszawska K, Kirsch S, Witte E, Wolk K, et al. Biology of interleukin-10. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21:331-44.
14
Azizieh FY, Raghupathy R. IL-10 and pregnancy complications. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2017;44:252-8.
15
Gabryšová L, Howes A, Saraiva M, O’Garra A. The regulation of IL-10 expression. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014;380:157-90.
16
Vidyadhari M, Sujatha M, Krupa P, Jyothy A, Nallari P, Venkateshwari A. A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of interleukin-10 gene increases the risk for spontaneous abortions--a triad study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1129-34.
17
Leimar O. The evolution of phenotypic polymorphism: randomized strategies versus evolutionary branching. Am Nat. 2005;165:669-81.
18
Moindjie H, Santos ED, Gouesse RJ, Swierkowski-Blanchard N, Serazin V, Barnea ER, et al. Preimplantation factor is an anti-apoptotic effector in human trophoblasts involving p53 signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2504.
19
Wei D, Wu Q, Shi H. Apoptosis and p53 expression in the placental villi of females with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Exp Ther Med. 2014;7:191-4.
20
Kang HJ, Feng Z, Sun Y, Atwal G, Murphy ME, Rebbeck TR, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the p53 pathway regulate fertility in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9761-6.
21
Pim D, Banks L. p53 polymorphic variants at codon 72 exert different effects on cell cycle progression. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:196-9.
22
Santos TR, Silva KSF, Silva RCPC, Moura KKVO, Guillo LA, Ribeiro Júnior CL, et al. Infertility caused by an association between Arg72Pro polymorphism of the p53 gene and Glu298Asp of the eNOS gene in patients with endometriosis. Genet Mol Res. 2018;17:GMR18046.
23
Vidyadhari M, Sujatha M, Krupa P, Nallari P, Venkateshwari A. Haplotype analysis of IL-10 gene polymorphism in couples with spontaneous abortions and aborted fetuses. Immunol Res. 2017;65:853-61.
24
Yoon SH, Choi YM, Kim JJ, Hong MA, Lee SK, Yang KM, Paik EC. No association of p53 codon 72 polymorphism with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss in Korean population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;192:6-9.
25
Allafan S, Nazarabadi MH, Enghelabifar M, Khayatzadeh J, Abadi KS, Jalali M, et al. No association between recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following in vitro fertilization (IVF) with gene polymorphism (P53 Arg72Pro). The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2015;172:18-25.
26
Wiwanitkit V. Null effect of p53 codon 72 polymorphism on recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure: A summative assessment. Indian J Hum Genet. 2011;17:248-9.
27
Firouzabadi RD, Ghasemi N, Rozbahani MA, Tabibnejad N. Association of p53 polymorphism with ICSI/IVF failure and recurrent pregnancy loss. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49:216-9.
28
Lledo B, Turienzo A, Ortiz JA, Morales R, Ten J, Llácer J, et al. Negative effect of P72 polymorphism on p53 gene in IVF outcome in patients with repeated implantation failure and pregnancy loss. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:169-72.
29
Turienzo A, Lledó B, Ortiz JA, Morales R, Sanz J, Llácer J, et al. Prevalence of candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms on p53, IL-11, IL-10, VEGF and APOE in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and pregnancy loss (RPL). Hum Fertil (Camb). 2020;23:117-22.
30
Dedousi D, Mavrogianni D, Papamentzelopoulou M, Stavros S, Raouasnte R, Loutradis D, et al. Association between TP53 Arg72Pro variant and recurrent pregnancy loss in the Greek population. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2022 43:421-6.
31
Parveen F, Shukla A, Agarwal S. Cytokine gene polymorphisms in northern Indian women with recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:433-40.
32
Qaddourah RH, Magdoud K, Saldanha FL, Mahmood N, Mustafa FE, Mahjoub T, et al. IL-10 gene promoter and intron polymorphisms and changes in IL-10 secretion in women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1025-34.
33
Bahadori M, Zarei S, Zarnani AH, Zarei O, Idali F, Hadavi R, et al. IL-6, IL-10 and IL-17 gene polymorphisms in Iranian women with recurrent miscarriage. Iran J Immunol. 2014;11:97-104.
34
Zastavna D, Sosnina K, Terpylyak O, Huleyuk N, Bezkorovayna H, Mikula M, et al. Cytogenetic and immunogenetic analysis of recurrent pregnancy loss in women. Tsitol Genet. 2014;48:44-50.
35
Bohiltea LC, Radoi EV. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms and recurrent pregnancy loss in Romanian population. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014;12:617-22.
36
Liu RX, Wang Y, Wen LH. Relationship between cytokine gene polymorphisms and recurrent spontaneous abortion. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:9786-92.
37
Saadat M, Ansari-Lari M, Farhud DD. Consanguineous marriage in Iran. Ann Hum Biol. 2004;31:263-9.
38
Rad IA. Thee impact of consanguinity on fetal loss. Med J Islamic World Acad Sci. 2010;18:151-4.
39
Saad FA, Jauniaux E. Recurrent early pregnancy loss and consanguinity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5:167-70.
40
Gowri V, Udayakumar AM, Bsiso W, Al Farsi Y, Rao K. Recurrent early pregnancy loss and consanguinity in Omani couples. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:1167-9.
41
Huang N, Chi H, Qiao J. Role of regulatory t cells in regulating fetal-maternal immune tolerance in healthy pregnancies and reproductive diseases. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1023.