Association of TAB2 gene polymorphism with endometrial cancer susceptibility and clinical analysis
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Clinical Investigation
VOLUME: ISSUE:
P: -

Association of TAB2 gene polymorphism with endometrial cancer susceptibility and clinical analysis

1. Sichuan University, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Center for Translational Medicine, Laboratory of Molecular Translational Medicine, Sichuan, China
2. Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital, Clinic of Andrology/Sichuan Human Sperm Bank, Chengdu, China
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 29.10.2024
Accepted Date: 06.01.2025
Online Date: 18.02.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objective

Transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 binding protein 2 (TAB2) plays a vital role in inflammatory pathways. It has also been considered a potential target for the enhancement of the the antiestrogen effects. Previous evidence has indicated that TAB2 gene variants are associated with several diseases, whereas their potential correlation with endometrial cancer (EC) is unclear. This study aims to initially explore the association between TAB2 gene polymorphisms (rs237028 /AG, rs521845 T/G, and rs652921 T/C) and EC.

Materials and Methods

Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism was applied to determine the genotype composition and the allele frequencies of TAB2 gene variant polymorphisms in 270 EC patients and 294 healthy controls.

Results

The G allele of rs521845 was related to the increase of EC risk [p=0.08, odds ratio (OR): 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.91]. Moreover, EC risk was associated with rs521845 in different genetic models (p=0.017, OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.91 in the codominant model; p=0.0051, OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.87 in the dominant model). For rs237028, the percentage of AG genotype in patients with highly differentiated tumours (G1) was significantly higher than that in moderately, poorly differentiated patients (G2/G3) (p=0.031, OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.45-1.30).

Conclusion

Our results showed that the rs521845 polymorphism of TAB2, was associated with EC risk, suggesting that TAB2 may play a crucial role in EC prognosis.

Keywords:
Endometrial cancer, TAB2, polymorphisms, risk

PRECIS: This study investigates the association between TAB2 gene polymorphisms and endometrial cancer (EC). The rs521845 G allele was linked to increased EC risk, while the rs237028 AG genotype correlated with tumor differentiation. Findings suggest TAB2 may play a key role in EC prognosis.

Introduction

Endometrial cancer (EC) is ranked as one of the significant gynecologic malignancies, with an estimated 420,242 new cases diagnosed and 97,704 deaths worldwide in 2022(1, 2). Among malignant tumours of the female reproductive system in China, the incidence of EC is only lower than that of cervical cancer, and it mainly occurs in postmenopausal women(3). However, in the past decade, the onset age of this disease has tended to become younger, and the incidence rate in young women has increased steadily year by year(4). EC risk factors include persistent estrogen stimulation without progesterone antagonism(5), obesity, diabetes, and hypertension, and infertility(6). However, the molecular pathogenesis of EC remains unclear.

Previous research have shown that in the process of tumour formation and progression, in addition to the activation of related proto-oncogenes and inactivation of tumour suppressor genes, inflammatory stimulation and avoidance of immune surveillance are also important pathogenic factors(7). Therefore, the tumour microenvironment(8) has become a research hotspot, as it is composed of tumour-related cells, inflammatory cells, immune cells, various cytokines secreted by related cells, and extracellular matrix(9). Evidence from multiple sources has suggested that a critical factor in the occurrence and development of EC is the inflammatory microenvironment, and various inflammatory immune responses jointly promote the angiogenesis, proliferation, and invasion of EC(10).

Transforming growth factor-β-activated-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) binding protein 2 (TAB2) is crucial to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) as a K63-polyubiquitin-binding TAK1 adaptor protein(11), which is critical to TAK1 activation and downstream interleukin (IL)-1β induced nuclear factor-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation(12, 13). TNF and IL-1-induced signal pathway activation is vital to inflammation, immunity, and cancer development(14); TAB2 has been suggested to be meaningful in several diseases. Moreover, the TAB2 gene, which encodes TAB2 protein, is identified to be significantly correlated with diseases such as coronary heart disease(15), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM)(16), congenital heart disease(17), breast cancer(18), and epithelial ovarian cancer(19). Endometrial, breast, and ovarian cancers share some hormonal and epidemiologic risk factors(20). Currently, no studies have been conducted on EC and TAB2 gene variation.

With the implementation of the Human Genome Project, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) research has become an essential approach in studying disease-related genes(21). Single nucleotide polymorphisms are the most common genetic variations in the human genome, and they can affect the expression of a gene, leading to certain changes in cells. To date, genome-wide association studies have confirmed multiple SNPs associated with EC(22, 23). Based on the above, we hypothesized that TAB2 gene polymorphism was associated with EC risk. To test our hypothesis, we conducted the following studies to assess the role of rs237028 (A/G), rs521845 (T/G), and rs652921(T/C). To our knowledge, this study would be the first to evaluate the correlation between TAB2 gene polymorphism and EC susceptibility.

Materials and Methods

Study Subjects

In this retrospective study, 270 EC women (mean age: 51.63±9.79 years) were recruited from the West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University from July 2010 to July 2016. All patients were diagnosed with EC by pathologists after histologic examination of biopsy tissue. Patients with autoimmune diseases or other malignancies were excluded to avoid multifactorial effects. The tumour stage is defined by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) surgical staging system for EC. The control group consisted of 294 healthy women (mean age: 51.86±12.70 years) who had no abnormal EC clinical symptoms and other underlying diseases and were randomly selected from routine physical examinations.

The present study was approved by the Medical Ethical Review Committee of West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University (approval number: 038, date: 03.03.2022), and all participants gave informed consent.

DNA Extraction and Genotyping

The DNA isolation kit (BioTeke, Peking, China) was used to extract subjects’ genomic DNA from blood samples per the manufacturer’s instructions and stored the DNA at -20 °C. The rs237028 (A/G), rs521845 (T/G), and rs652921 (T/C) SNPs in the TAB2 gene were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Primer3.0 software was used to design primer sequences, which are shown in Table 1. The total volume of the PCR reaction was 10 mL, including 100 ng of the genomic DNA, 5 mL 2× Power Taq PCR MasterMix (BioTeke, Peking, China), 0.15 mL each primer, 3.7 mL ddH2O. The PCR cycle conditions of all SNPs were 95 °C for 4 minutes, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 seconds, 60 °C for 30 seconds, 72 °C for 30 seconds and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes. Then, PCR products were digested by restriction enzymes (shown in Table 1). Finally, the genotype of the sites was determined through the Fragment Analyzer 96 Automated CE system (AATI, America); about 10% of the samples were randomly selected for repeated determination, and the results were 100% consistent.

Statistical Analysis

Version 20.0 of the SPSS software package for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the data. The genotype associations between the TAB2 gene and EC were calculated by SNPstats online analysis software (https://www.snpstats.net/start.htm), which assessed the frequency distributions of four genetic models (codominant, dominant, recessive, and overdominant) in EC women and healthy controls. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare allele frequencies, genotype distributions, and the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium between the two groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the influences of different alleles and genotypes. The primary parameters compared included allele frequency, genotype distribution, OR, and 95% CI between EC patients and controls. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Result

Clinical Characteristics and Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Test

Between the EC patients and control subjects, there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) in general characteristics, such as mean age, body mass index (BMI), menopausal ratio, pregnancy history, etc. (shown in Table 2). Among the 270 EC patients, 247 patients had abnormal uterine bleeding, and 268 had received surgical treatment. The primary histopathological type of these patients was endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The genotypes of the three SNPs (rs237028, rs521845, rs652921) in the two groups all conformed to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

TAB2 Gene Polymorphisms and EC Susceptibility

The differences in the allele frequencies and genotypes of the three SNPs between patients with EC and controls are presented in Table 3. The genotype distributions of T/T, T/G, and G/G for rs521845 were 32.1%, 52.2%, and 15.7% in the case group and 43.5%, 44.9%, and 11.6% in the control group, respectively. Significance had been observed in the codominant model (p=0.017). In the dominant model, compared with the T/T genotype, T/G or G/G genotypes were associated with a significantly decreased risk of EC (p=0.0051, OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.87). Similarly, the frequency of G allele of rs521845 was higher in patients (42%) than in controls (34%) (p=0.08, OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.56-0.91). Meanwhile, similar results were observed between patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma and controls. No significant correlation was found between EC and rs237028 or rs652921.

Association Between TAB2 Gene Polymorphisms and Clinical Features

To learn more about the association between the three SNPs and EC, we stratified these EC patients according to age, BMI, family history of cancer, menopausal status, histological types, FIGO grades, myometrium invasion, parametrial invasion, cervical invasion, and lymph nodes status (Tables 4, 5, and 6). It was observed that for rs237028, the percentage of AG genotype in patients with highly differentiated tumours (G1) was significantly higher than that in moderately differentiated patients (G2/G3) (p=0.031, OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.45-1.30). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences among subgroups of other SNPs.

Discussion

The TAB2 gene maps on chromosome 6q25.1 and encodes a scaffold protein that forms a kinase complex that links TRAF6 and TAK1, thus determining TAK1 activation(24). TAK1 has been implicated in regulating various cellular processes, including embryonic development, differentiation, autophagy, apoptosis, and cell survival has been thought to be related to the occurrence and development of cancer(25). TAB2, as an essential protein for TAK1 activation, has been studied in many diseases. Initially, Sanjo et al.(26) found that TAB2 was necessary for embryonic development by preventing hepatocyte apoptosis. Owerbach et al.(27) thatfirst identified that the TAB2 gene was associated with susceptibility to type 1 diabetes mellitus. It’s worth noting that in Thienpont et al.’s(28) study, the TAB2 gene was expressed in the developing heart and was mutated, deleted, or disrupted by a translocation among congenital heart defect patients. This suggested that the gene plays a vital role in the development of embryos and the formation of heart valves, a finding that has been linked to much subsequent research on the gene. Weiss et al.’s(29) report supported the association of TAB2 haploinsufficiency with various congenital heart defects. Cheng et al.(30,31) found that TAB2 microdeletion is a risk factor for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and proposed the necessity of SNP microarray analysis and molecular testing for a TAB2 loss of function variant in HLHS patients.

TAB2 is not just part of the inflammatory pathway, but also considered a potential target to potentiate antiestrogen action(32). Evidence provided by Reineri et al.(18) suggested that TAB2, in conjunction with the nuclear receptor corepressor complex and its novel functional domain, interacts with estrogen receptors in breast cancer cells. EC’s leading risk factor is exposure to endogenous and exogenous oestrogens, and estrogen requires estrogen to function physiologically through estrogen receptor α (ERS1). The ESR1 gene, encoding the estrogen receptor 1, is an identified oncogene for EC(33). It is worth noting that the TAB2 gene is close to the ESR1 gene on the chromosome. This suggests that the TAB2 gene may be interlinked with the ESR1 gene, jointly affecting the occurrence and development of EC.

In the latest study, Shen et al.(16) confirmed that the TAB2 gene polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to DCM in a Chinese population. Furthermore, their results showed that the risk of DCM was higher among G (A/G-G/G) carriers of rs237028, C carriers (C/T-C/C) of rs652921, and G carriers (T/G-G/G) of rs521845. Interestingly, Huang et al.(19) showed that only rs237028 polymorphism in the TAB2 gene was significantly associated with ovarian cancer susceptibility.

Although TAB2 gene variants are significantly associated with various diseases, the association with EC remains unclear. Accordingly, we decided to investigate whether the TAB2 gene polymorphism has an impact on EC. We selected the three SNPs located on the intron of the TAB2 gene, may influence the regulation of gene expression. In the present study, we first confirmed that the rs521845 polymorphism in TAB2 is significantly associated with EC susceptibility. Our data showed that the decrease in EC risk was related to the T allele of rs521845. Moreover, in both codominant and dominant models, the TT genotype of rs521845 was correlated with a lower EC risk. Therefore, TAB2 might be a potential protective factor for EC. However, the other two SNPs (rs237028, rs652921) had no significant link with EC.

Conclusion

According to the degree of differentiation of EC tissue, EC tissue differentiation can be classified as the grade 1 (highly differentiated, G1), the grade 2 (moderately differentiated, G2), and the grade 3 (poorly differentiated, G3). The lower the degree of differentiation, the more malignancy is exhibited. For rs237028, patients with A/G genotype had lower-grade tumours (G1), compared to patients with genotype A/A or G/G. Stratified analysis of the three SNP genotypes of the TAB2 gene showed no significant differences in age, BMI, family history, and menopause history. Although rs521845 variation in TAB2 was associated with EC susceptibility, there were no significant differences in the clinicopathological features of EC such as pathological stage, histological grade, and histological type among patients with different genotypes.

In summary, polymorphisms found in the rs521845 site of the TAB2 gene may serve as a novel genetic marker of susceptibility to EC in Chinese women. The findings of other independent research groups suggest that the TAB2 gene may play an essential role in EC’s molecular pathogenesis. However, the function and the underlying signal transduction mechanisms of TAB2 in EC development need to be clarified. This study has certain limitations. Although these deficiencies were random, due to incomplete clinical information of some patients, they may affect the accuracy and objectivity of stratified analysis results. Therefore, these findings need to be further confirmed in a larger cohort. Secondly, the functions of the three SNPs studied in this research and the potential mechanism of rs521845 SNP in the development of EC are still unclear. Further investigations are warranted.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The present study was approved by the Medical Ethical Review Committee of West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University (approval number: 038, date: 03.03.2022).
Informed Consent: Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: Y.W., Design: Y.W., Data Collection or Processing: S.L., Analysis or Interpretation: S.L., Literature Search: S.L., Writing: S.L.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81974226, No.81974365) and Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (No: 2021YFS0026).

References

1
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229-63.
3
Jiang X, Tang H, Chen T. Epidemiology of gynecologic cancers in China. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018;29:e7.
5
Moore K, Brewer MA. Endometrial cancer: is this a new disease? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2017;37:435-42.
7
Biler A, Solmaz U, Erkilinc S, Gokcu M, Bagci M, Temel O, et al. Analysis of endometrial carcinoma in young women at a high-volume cancer center. Int J Surg. 2017;44:185-90.
9
Kim JJ, Kurita T, Bulun SE. Progesterone action in endometrial cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and breast cancer. Endocr Rev. 2013;34:130-62.
11
Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2016;387:1094-108.
13
Greten FR, Grivennikov SI. Inflammation and cancer: triggers, mechanisms, and consequences. Immunity. 2019;51:27-41.
15
Kahlert C, Kalluri R. Exosomes in tumor microenvironment influence cancer progression and metastasis. J Mol Med (Berl). 2013;91:431-7.
17
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646-74.
19
Trabert B, Eldridge RC, Pfeiffer RM, Shiels MS, Kemp TJ, Guillemette C, et al. Prediagnostic circulating inflammation markers and endometrial cancer risk in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer (PLCO) screening trial. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:600-10.
21
Ishitani T, Takaesu G, Ninomiya-Tsuji J, Shibuya H, Gaynor RB, Matsumoto K. Role of the TAB2-related protein TAB3 in IL-1 and TNF signaling. EMBO J. 2003;22:6277-88.
23
Kanayama A, Seth RB, Sun L, Ea CK, Hong M, Shaito A, et al. TAB2 and TAB3 activate the NF-kappaB pathway through binding to polyubiquitin chains. Mol Cell. 2004;15:535-48.
25
Braun H, Staal J. Stabilization of the TAK1 adaptor proteins TAB2 and TAB3 is critical for optimal NF-κB activation. FEBS J. 2020;287:3161-4.
27
Zhou Q, Cheng C, Wei Y, Yang J, Zhou W, Song Q, et al. USP15 potentiates NF-κB activation by differentially stabilizing TAB2 and TAB3. FEBS J. 2020;287:3165-83.
29
Chen J, Yuan H, Xie K, Wang X, Tan L, Zou Y, et al. A novel TAB2 nonsense mutation (p.S149X) causing autosomal dominant congenital heart defects: a case report of a Chinese family. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20:27.
31
Shen C, Zhong Y, Huang X, Wang Y, Peng Y, Li K, et al. Associations betweenTAB2 gene polymorphisms and dilated cardiomyopathy in a Chinese population. Biomark Med. 2020;14:441-50.
33
Permanyer E, Laurie S, Blasco-Lucas A, Maldonado G, Amador-Catalan A, Ferrer-Curriu G, et al. A single nucleotide deletion resulting in a frameshift in exon 4 of TAB2 is associated with a polyvalular syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63:103854.
35
Reineri S, Agati S, Miano V, Sani M, Berchialla P, Ricci L, et al. A novel functional domain of TAB2 involved in the interaction with estrogen receptor alpha in breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0168639.
37
Huang X, Shen C, Zhang Y, Li Q, Li K, Wang Y, et al. Associations betweenTAB2 gene polymorphisms and epithelial ovarian cancer in a Chinese population. Dis Markers. 2019;2019:8012979.
39
Pfeiffer RM, Park Y, Kreimer AR, Lacey JV Jr, Pee D, Greenlee RT, et al. Risk prediction for breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in white women aged 50 y or older: derivation and validation from population-based cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001492.
41
Yates CM, Sternberg MJ. The effects of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) on protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol. 2013;425:3949-63.
43
Cheng TH, Thompson DJ, O’Mara TA, Painter JN, Glubb DM, Flach S, et al. Five endometrial cancer risk loci identified through genome-wide association analysis. Nat Genet. 2016;48:667-74.
45
Chen MM, O’Mara TA, Thompson DJ, Painter JN, Attia J, Black A, et al. GWAS meta-analysis of 16 852 women identifies new susceptibility locus for endometrial cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:2612-20.
47
Takaesu G, Kishida S, Hiyama A, Yamaguchi K, Shibuya H, Irie K, et al. TAB2, a novel adaptor protein, mediates activation of TAK1 MAPKKK by linking TAK1 to TRAF6 in the IL-1 signal transduction pathway. Mol Cell. 2000;5:649-58.
49
Aashaq S, Batool A, Andrabi KI. TAK1 mediates convergence of cellular signals for death and survival. Apoptosis. 2019;24:3-20.
51
Sanjo H, Takeda K, Tsujimura T, Ninomiya-Tsuji J, Matsumoto K, Akira S. TAB2 is essential for prevention of apoptosis in fetal liver but not for interleukin-1 signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:1231-8.
53
Owerbach D, Piña L, Gabbay KH. A 212-kb region on chromosome 6q25 containing theTAB2 gene is associated with susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53:1890-3.
55
Thienpont B, Zhang L, Postma AV, Breckpot J, Tranchevent LC, Van Loo P, et al. Haploinsufficiency of TAB2 causes congenital heart defects in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:839-49.
57
Weiss K, Applegate C, Wang T, Batista DA. Familial TAB2 microdeletion and congenital heart defects including unusual valve dysplasia and tetralogy of fallot. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A:2702-6.
59
Cheng A, Dinulos MBP, Neufeld-Kaiser W, Rosenfeld J, Kyriss M, Madan-Khetarpal S, et al. 6q25.1 (TAB2) microdeletion syndrome: congenital heart defects and cardiomyopathy. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173:1848-57.
61
Cheng A, Neufeld-Kaiser W, Byers PH, Liu YJ. 6q25.1 (TAB2) microdeletion is a risk factor for hypoplastic left heart: a case report that expands the phenotype. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20:137.
63
Cutrupi S, Reineri S, Panetto A, Grosso E, Caizzi L, Ricci L, et al. Targeting of the adaptor protein TAB2 as a novel approach to revert tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2012;31:4353-61.
65
Zhou X, Gu Y, Wang DN, Ni S, Yan J. Eight functional polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor 1 gene and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60851.