Clinical Investigation

What should be the strategy in case of a big follicle at the start of the cycle? Shall we start the stimulation or postpone it to the next cycle?

10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.15943

  • Şule Yıldırım Köpük
  • Ayşen Yücetürk
  • Zeynep Ece Utkan Korun
  • Özge Karaosmanoğlu
  • Yiğit Çakıroğlu
  • Bülent Tıraş

Received Date: 08.09.2022 Accepted Date: 14.10.2022 Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2022;19(4):275-280 PMID: 36511582

Objective:

This study facilitates decision-making when an antral follicle diameter >15 mm is detected at the beginning of the menstrual cycle in poor responder (POR) patients.

Materials and Methods:

Eighty-three POR patients with at least one leading follicle with a diameter of 15 to 24 mm on the 2nd-4th days of the menstrual cycle were assessed.

Results:

The mean age of females was 40.1±4.8 (26-45), and the mean partners’ age was 42.1±7.8 (26-65). Fifty-one (61.4%) women underwent an oocyte pick-up procedure 36 h after the first ultrasonographic examination on the 2nd-4th days of the menstrual cycle. Gonadotrophin stimulation was initiated in 32 (38.6%) patients. Among women in whom oocyte retrieval was performed, an oocyte was obtained in 49 (59.75%) patients. In 13 of 49 patients (26.5%), no mature oocytes were obtained. Fertilized 2pn embryos were obtained in 18 of 33 patients (54.5%). Among the fertilized embryos, 12 were good, six were moderate, and two were of poor quality. Following the frozen embryo transfer procedure, one of the two patients experienced a clinical pregnancy.

Conclusion:

Patients with POR are still difficult to manage both clinically and therapeutically. Since every oocyte is valuable and important, patients should be carefully followed up. Our research will be directed by the need to rule out a physiological ovarian cyst when large antral follicles appear at the beginning of the cycle. The clinician should give them a chance.

Keywords: Poor responder, diminished ovarian reserve, big antral follicle

PRECIS: The emergence of big antral follicles at the beginning of the menstrual cycle should not be misdiagnosed as a physiological ovarian cyst and should be given a chance.


Introduction

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is defined as a reduction in the quantity of the ovarian follicular reserve, which occurs in 31% of ART cycles(1). Patients with DOR are generally considered challenging because they exhibit poor ovarian response (POR), which accounts for 9-24% of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment(2,3). POR leads to fewer retrieved oocytes and fewer embryos to be transferred, which lowers pregnancy and live birth rates (LBR)(4).

Patient-oriented strategies encompassing individualized oocyte number (POSEIDON) classification, which was established in 2016, is used to classify and treat patients with POR. The “low prognosis patient” is defined in this categorization and is divided into four subgroups according to (i) age, (ii) ovarian reserve markers [antral follicle count (AFC) and/or anti-mullerian hormone (AMH)], and (iii) the results of prior ovarian stimulation. Groups 1 and 2 are designated for women under the age of 35 and women over the age of 35 who have sufficient ovarian reserve parameters (AFC >5, AMH >1.2 ng/mL). Groups 3 and 4 are designated for women under the age of 35 and 35 years or older who have inadequate ovarian reserve parameters (AFC <5, AMH <1.2 ng/mL), respectively(5). POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 are called “expected POR,” constituting 10% and 55% of the IVF cycle, respectively(6).

The management of patients with POR remains a challenge for clinicians. The number of retrieved oocytes considerably influences clinical outcomes concerning cumulative LBR. The increasing number of retrieved oocytes, the higher cumulative LBR(7,8). However, the IVF cycle for patients with POR often results in a follicular developmental arrest, premature ovulation, and cancellation of oocyte retrieval(9,10). Additionally, these women have a high risk of not having any high-quality embryos available for transfer; they often undergo multiple ovarian stimulation cycles, which causes physical, emotional, and financial costs(6).

There is no standard treatment for POR concerning protocol and drugs. Ovarian stimulation is suggested to be started when the serum estradiol level is <50 pg/mL, the endometrial lining is <5 mm, and no dominant follicle >10 mm exists during the early follicular phase, typically on day 2nd or 3rd of the following menses(11). When an antral follicle >15 mm exists, it can be diagnosed as a retantional ovarian follicle or physiological ovarian cyst. Controlled ovarian stimulation was postponed. Whether or not to stimulate has been a conundrum.

This study facilitates decision- making when an antral follicle >15 mm is detected at the start of the menstrual cycle.


Materials and Methods


Patient Selection

Between January 2020 and February 2021, the IVF Center at Acıbadem University Maslak Hospital in İstanbul, Turkey, conducted this retrospective cohort study. The POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 criteria were met by patients who had IVF cycles and were recruited in the study. Group 3 consisted of women <35 years of age, AFC <5, and AMH <1.2 ng/mL. Group 4 consisted of women ≥35 years of age, AFC <5, and AMH <1.2 ng/mL. Age requirements for inclusion were 25-45 years old, and at least one leading follicle must have a diameter of 15-24 mm on the 2nd-4th days of the menstrual cycle. Women with body mass indices greater than 30 kg/m2 and partners who had severe male factor infertility were excluded (e.g., aspermia, azoospermia). Each patient’s complete medical history was analyzed, including their age, the age of their partners, any prior treatments, and the duration of their infertility. The primary outcome measures were the total number of oocytes, mature oocytes, and embryos.


Controlled Ovarian Stimulation

Gonadotrophin stimulation was initiated at 300 IU recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (randomized Gonal F randomly; Merck, or Fostimon; IBSA) with one falcon of Gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist if TV-USG revealed a follicle >15 mm on the 2nd-4th days of the menstrual cycle (0.25-mg cetrorelix; Cetrotide; Merck Serono). Serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone levels were checked at each examination. Whenever the diameter of the leading follicle at the beginning of the cycle was 18 mm, final oocyte maturation was triggered by the administration of 250 mcg recombinant human choriogonadotropin alfa (rHCG, Ovitrelle; Serono).

If TV-USG revealed a follicle with a diameter between 18 and 24 mm on the 2nd-4th days of the menstrual cycle, final oocyte maturation was triggered by the administration of 250 mcg rHCG (Ovitrelle; Serono) with one dose of GnRH antagonist (0.25-mg cetrorelix; Cetrotide; Merck Serono). After 36 h following hCG injection, oocyte pick-up (OPU) was performed under sedation anesthesia using a 35 cm 17-G double lumen needle. Four hours after retrieval, oocyte denudation and ICSI were conducted. The cell quantity and morphological quality of embryos were evaluated using the İstanbul consensus workshop criteria(12). Good-quality embryos were frozen at the cleavage stage for embryo banking.


Statistical Analysis

SPSS software (version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Continuous variables were expressed using the median, mean, and standard deviation (minimum-maximum). Categorical variables were reported as numbers and percentages (%). Through using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the distribution of the data was examined. The two groups were compared using the Student’s t-test. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.


Results

Eighty-three women were retrospectively enrolled. The mean age of the females was 40.1±4.8 (26-45), and the mean partners’ age was 42.1±7.8 (26-65). Table 1 lists the baseline characteristics of the included cycles: Age, length of infertility, basal FSH levels, AMH, and the number of antral follicles. Fifty-one (61.4%) women underwent an OPU procedure 36 h after the first ultrasonographic examination on 2nd-4th days of the menstrual cycle. Gonadotrophin stimulation was initiated in 32 (38.6%) patients. Gonadotropin duration was one day in 20 (24.1%) patients, two days for 10 (11%), and three days for 2 (2.4%) patients subsequently. The mean follicular diameter of the largest follicle (mm) at the start of the cycle was 18.7±2.5 (15-24). The mean follicular diameter of the largest follicle (mm) on hCG day was 19.6±2.0 (17-24). Table 2 summarizes the clinical and IVF outcome characteristics for women. Oocyte retrieval was successfully performed in 82 women, while one woman was unable to be retrieval due to premature ovulation. At least one oocyte was found in 49 patients with oocyte retrieval (59.75%). One oocyte was obtained in 42 patients, and two oocytes were obtained in seven patients. No mature oocytes were obtained in 13 of the 49 patients (26.5%). Fertilized 2pn embryos were obtained in 18 of 33 patients (54.5%). Among the fertilized embryos, 12 were of good quality, six were moderate quality, and two were poor quality. Eighteen patients opted for embryo pooling in the cleavage stage, but unfortunately, one embryo was arrested in the 2pn stage. Two patients underwent frozen embryo transfer, and a patient experienced a clinical pregnancy as a result. When we compared the baseline characteristics of the women in whom at least one oocyte was obtained or not, the analysis revealed that the partner’s age was significantly higher in at least one oocyte-obtained group (p=0.03). The peak serum E2 level was significantly higher in at least one oocyte-obtained group (p=0.05) (Table 3). The flow chart of this study is detailed in Figure 1.


Discussion

In this study, we investigated whether the cycle should be started immediately or postponed to the next cycle in case of a large antral follicle at the start of the menstrual cycle with at least an antral follicle >15 mm in women diagnosed with POR. A total of 82 women underwent an OPU procedure. At least one oocyte was obtained in 49 (59.75%) of the 82 patients. Among them, 18/33 (54.5%) had at least fertilized cleavage stage embryos.

In the previous studies in the 1950s-1970s, the traditional theory of human folliculogenesis stated two phases(13,14,15). The first two weeks of the menstrual cycle are termed the “follicular phase,” that a single cohort of antral follicles grows. The last two weeks of the cycle are termed the “luteal phase,” when the corpus luteum grows in the absence of a follicle. Inhibin B suppresses FSH secretion during the follicular phase, whereas by regressing the corpus luteum, inhibin A secretion decrease, and FSH inhibition escape during the luteal-follicular transition(16). When ovarian reserve diminishes, granulosa cells show a gradual decline in inhibin B secretion, with a consequent rise in FSH levels that stimulate earlier follicular development during the luteal-follicular transition period. As a result, accelerated follicular growth can be pictured(17,18). Klein et al.(19) reported that the older patients over >40-45 years of age in the control cycles demonstrated an elevated day 3 FSH and a shortened follicular phase compared with the younger patients aged 20-25 years.

In our study, the mean patient’s age was 40.1±4.8 (26-45), the mean AFC was 1.4±1.2 (0-4), both advanced female age and DOR resulted in accelerated follicular growth. These women were also likely to have large antral follicles due to advanced follicular maturation in the very early days of the follicular phase. Turan et al.(20) reported the IVF conception of seven patients with DOR following a very short ovarian stimulation of incidentally discovered large antral follicles in the early follicular phase. Six embryos were obtained after eight oocytes from seven patients were removed, and two live births and a 50% ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer were the results(20).

In this study, oocytes were obtained in 59.75% of the patients, who was an undeniably high rate. The number of oocytes retrieved during controlled ovarian stimulation has a considerable impact on the cumulative LBR each cycle initiated(3). The number of oocytes retrieved had a substantial relationship with LBR; the predicted LBR for one oocyte recovered at ages 18-34, 35-37, 38-39, and 40 years and older was 8%, 7%, 5%, and 1%, respectively(21). According to the national summary report of patients with DOR in 2020, the chance of live birth with intended egg retrieval and first embryo transfer was 2.6% at more than 42 years of age, 13.6% between 38 and 40 years of age; 22.8% at <35 years(22). In another study, Polyzos et al.(23) analyzed 14.469 patients and reported that cumulative LBRs steadily increased with the number of oocytes, which was categorized according to age (<36, 36-39, >40 years), revealed the same pattern, showing a steady increase in cumulative LBR with the number of oocytes, but cumulative LBRs decreased with increasing age for a given number of oocytes. In other words, one retrieved oocyte provides 1-8% live birth chances, so every additionally retrieved oocyte has a significant impact on the LBR. As our study proved, each follicle that develops in patients with POR is important and contributes to the LBR.

There are a limited number of studies on this subject in the literature. This study is unique, with a high number of cases. Clinicians encounter this situation frequently, but generally, oral contraceptive drugs are prescribed or postponed in stimulation protocols that may cause emotional stress and costs to the anxious infertile couple. When an antral follicle diameter more than 15 mm is detected at the start of the menstrual cycle in patients with POR, clinicians may recommend an OPU procedure. Additionally, it is a cost-effective treatment because of its short stimulation duration.


Study Limitations

The limitation of this study is that only two patients underwent frozen embryo transfer because of embryo pooling continuing. Also, thin endometrium development is not appropriate for receiving fresh embryo transfer.


Conclusion

Clinical management and treating patients with POR is still challenging. Patients should be followed cautiously because each oocyte considerably affects the LBR. Our study could be guided when the emergence of big antral follicles at the beginning of the menstrual cycle should not be misdiagnosed as a physiological ovarian cyst and should be given a chance.


Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the local ethics committee with an approval number 2021/05 (Acıbadem University Clinical Research Ethics Committee, date: 13.03.2021).

Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: Ş.Y.K., A.Y., Z.E.U.K., Concept: Ş.Y.K., Y.Ç., B.T., Design: Ş.Y.K., Y.Ç., B.T., Data Collection or Processing: Ş.Y.K., Z.E.U.K., Ö.K., Analysis or Interpretation: Ş.Y.K., A.Y., Y.Ç., Literature Search: Ş.Y.K., A.Y., Writing: Ş.Y.K., Z.E.U.K., Y.Ç.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

Images

  1. Bukulmez O. Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Assisted Reproductive Technologies Springer: Cham, 2019.
  2. Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Ferrero S, Baroni E, Sapienza F, Cobellis L, et al. Management of poor responders in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:235-46.
  3. Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi N, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. What is new in the management of poor ovarian response in IVF? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2018;30:155-62.
  4. Setti AS, de Almeida Ferreira Braga DP, de Cássia Savio Figueira R, de Castro Azevedo M, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Are poor responders patients at higher risk for producing aneuploid embryos in vitro? J Assist Reprod Genet 2011;28:399-404.
  5. Poseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number), Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, et al. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril 2016;105:1452-3.
  6. Haahr T, Dosouto C, Alviggi C, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Management Strategies for POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019;10:614.
  7. Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, de Vos M, Tournaye H, et al. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Hum Reprod 2016;31:370-6.
  8. Steward RG, Lan L, Shah AA, Yeh JS, Price TM, Goldfarb JM, et al. Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2014;101:967-73.
  9. Schimberni M, Morgia F, Colabianchi J, Giallonardo A, Piscitelli C, Giannini P, et al. Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization in poor responder patients: a survey of 500 consecutive cycles. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1297-301.
  10. Polyzos NP, Blockeel C, Verpoest W, De Vos M, Stoop D, Vloeberghs V, et al. Live birth rates following natural cycle IVF in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2012;27:3481-6.
  11. Barash A, Weissman A, Manor M, Milman D, Ben-Arie A, Shoham Z. Prospective evaluation of endometrial thickness as a predictor of pituitary down-regulation after gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue administration in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1998;69:496-9.
  12. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1270-83.
  13. Block E. Quantitative morphological investigations of the follicular system in women; variations in the different phases of the sexual cycle. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1951;8:33-54.
  14. Sherman BM, Korenman SG. Hormonal characteristics of the human menstrual cycle throughout reproductive life. J Clin Invest 1975;55:699-706.
  15. Lintern-Moore S, Peters H, Moore G, Faber M. Follicular development in the infant human ovary. J Reprod Fertil 1974;9:53-64.
  16. Taylor H PL, Sell E. Speroff’s Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 9th ed. Taylor HPL, Sell E (eds) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020.
  17. Klein NA, Harper AJ, Houmard BS, Sluss PM, Soules MR. Is the short follicular phase in older women secondary to advanced or accelerated dominant follicle development? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:5746-50.
  18. van Zonneveld P, Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Blankenstein MA, de Jong FH, Looman CW, et al. Do cycle disturbances explain the age-related decline of female fertility? Cycle characteristics of women aged over 40 years compared with a reference population of young women. Hum Reprod 2003;18:495-501.
  19. Klein NA, Battaglia DE, Fujimoto VY, Davis GS, Bremner WJ, Soules MR. Reproductive aging: accelerated ovarian follicular development associated with a monotropic follicle-stimulating hormone rise in normal older women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:1038-45.
  20. Turan V, Sonmezer M, Sonmezer M. Ongoing pregnancy and healthy live births following very short ovarian stimulation of incidentally observed big antral follicles in oligoamenorrheic patients with extremely decreased ovarian reserve. JBRA Assist Reprod 2021;25:324-7.
  21. Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1768-74.
  22. SART NSR: Preliminary National Summary Report for 2020. Accessed: July 28, 2020. Available from: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/CSR/PublicSnapshotReport?ClinicPKID=&reportingYear=2020
  23. Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, Pellicer A, Santos-Ribeiro S, Tournaye H, et al. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including approximately 15,000 women. Fertil Steril 2018;110:661-70.e1.